Solar panels in Nampa, ID
Roofs in Nampa get about 1,677 hours of usable sunlight a year — more than 71% of the cities we've measured. Here's what that means in cost, savings and payback, using real rooftop data rather than a national average.
Check your specific roof in Nampa → City averages are a starting point; your own roof's size, pitch and shading change the answer a lot.
What a typical Nampa solar system costs
A 19-panel system (7.6 kW) is about right for an average Nampa home using 10,800 kWh a year. It would produce roughly 10,833 kWh annually and offset 100% of that usage.
| System | Size | kWh/yr | Net cost | Saves/yr | Payback |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 panels | 3.2 kW | 4,561 | $6,384 | $511 | 12.5 yrs |
| 12 panels | 4.8 kW | 6,842 | $9,576 | $766 | 12.5 yrs |
| 16 panels | 6.4 kW | 9,123 | $12,768 | $1,022 | 12.5 yrs |
| 20 panels | 8 kW | 11,404 | $15,960 | $1,227 | 13 yrs |
| 26 panels | 10.4 kW | 14,825 | $20,748 | $1,322 | 15.7 yrs |
How we worked this out for Nampa
Every number on this page comes from these seven steps. Nothing is a national average — the sunlight figure is measured from Nampa rooftops.
| # | Step | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | What one panel makes here 400W ÷ 1000 × 1,677 sun hrs × 0.85 system losses |
570 kWh/yr |
| 2 | Panels needed to cover typical usage 10,800 kWh ÷ 570 kWh per panel |
19 panels |
| 3 | System size 19 panels × 400W |
7.60 kW |
| 4 | Annual production 7.60 kW × 1,677 hrs × 0.85 |
10,833 kWh/yr |
| 5 | Installed cost 7,600 W × $2.85 per watt, then −30% federal credit |
$15,162 |
| 6 | Annual saving 3,780 kWh used as generated × 11.2¢ + 7,053 kWh exported × 11.2¢ |
$1,211/yr |
| 7 | Payback $15,162 ÷ $1,211 per year |
12.5 years |
Step 6 matters more than it looks. Only 35% of what a system this size produces in Nampa is used the moment it is generated; the other 7,053 kWh is exported and credited one-for-one under net metering. Because exports here are credited at or near retail, that split changes the payback very little — 12.5 years against the 12.5 we show. In places where exports pay a fraction of retail the same split moves payback by years, which is why we model it explicitly rather than assuming.
Assumptions: 400W panels, 15% system losses (inverter, wiring, heat, soiling), $2.85/W installed, 10,800 kWh typical annual household use, 11.2¢/kWh electricity. Change any of those and every figure above moves — which is exactly why a single national "solar costs X" number is misleading.
Notice that payback barely improves as systems get bigger, and eventually gets worse. That's because you can only save money on electricity you were going to buy anyway. Once a system covers your usage, extra panels mostly generate exports at a much lower rate.
Why Nampa gets 1,677 sun hours
That figure comes from Google's analysis of real rooftops across Nampa — it already accounts for shading from trees, chimneys and neighbouring buildings, which is why it's lower than the raw "hours of daylight" figures you'll see elsewhere. An unusually open, unshaded roof in Nampa reaches about 1,715 hours, roughly 2% better than typical.
The numbers behind this page
| Typical usable sunlight | 1,677 hrs/yr |
|---|---|
| Unshaded roof | 1,715 hrs/yr |
| Electricity rate (Idaho avg) | 11.2¢/kWh |
| Installed cost assumed | $2.85/W |
| Panel size assumed | 400 W |
| Federal tax credit | 30% |
| Typical household usage | 10,800 kWh/yr |
| Power used as generated | 35% |
| Paid for exported power | full retail (net metering) |
| Rooftops sampled here | 13 |
| Google imagery from | 2022 |
When Nampa actually produces
Annual totals hide the thing that catches people out: 38% of Nampa's yearly sunlight arrives in May–July, and just 12% across November–January.
| Month | Sun hrs | Share of year |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | 68 | |
| Feb | 96 | |
| Mar | 134 | |
| Apr | 174 | |
| May | 204 | |
| Jun | 217 | |
| Jul | 210 | |
| Aug | 186 | |
| Sep | 148 | |
| Oct | 107 | |
| Nov | 74 | |
| Dec | 60 |
Nampa produces about 3.6× as much in Jun as in Dec — a normal mid-latitude swing. Expect real winter shortfall and summer surplus rather than steady year-round output.
The annual total is measured from Google's rooftop imagery. Its split across months is calculated from solar geometry at Nampa's latitude, not separately measured, so treat the monthly figures as the shape of a typical year rather than a forecast.
How Nampa compares to the other 788 cities
| Measure | Nampa | Rank of 788 |
|---|---|---|
| Usable sunlight | 1,677 hrs | 229th |
| Sunlight lost to shade | 2% | 701st most |
| Median roof size | 154 m² | 537th largest |
| Electricity rate | 11.2¢ | 746th highest |
| Payback | 12.5 yrs | 589th fastest |
| Grid carbon | 696 kg/MWh | 217th dirtiest |
What actually stands out about Nampa:
- Unusually open roofs. Only 2% of available sunlight is lost to obstruction in Nampa — better than all but 87 of the 788 cities measured. Most roofs here get close to their theoretical maximum.
- Cheap electricity is the headwind. Idaho power costs about 11.2¢/kWh. Low rates are good news generally, but they lengthen solar payback — there is simply less bill to displace.
Cities with almost the same sunlight
These are the closest matches to Nampa's 1,677 usable sun hours from other states and provinces. Same sunlight, different electricity prices — which is usually what decides whether solar is worth it.
| City | Sun hrs | Rate | Payback |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alexandria, LA | 1,678 | 12.1¢ | 11.6 yrs |
| Dallas, TX | 1,675 | 15.1¢ | 9.3 yrs |
| College Station, TX | 1,674 | 15.1¢ | 9.3 yrs |
| Brunswick, GA | 1,674 | 14.1¢ | 10 yrs |
Nearby cities
See all of Idaho → statewide sunlight, rates, incentives and every city we've measured.
Nampa solar questions
How many solar panels do I need in Nampa?
About 19 panels for an average home using 10,800 kWh a year. Nampa roofs get 1,677 usable sun hours, so each 400W panel produces roughly 570 kWh annually. A typical Nampa roof fits about 51 panels, so roof space is unlikely to be your limit.
Is solar worth it in Nampa?
At 11.2¢/kWh and 1,677 sun hours, a typical system pays for itself in about 12.5 years and returns roughly $15,101 over a 25-year panel life. That is slower than average, so compare several quotes before committing. Exported power earns full retail credit here.
How much do solar panels cost in Nampa?
A 7.6 kW system costs about $21,660 before incentives and $15,162 after the 30% federal tax credit. That works out near $2.85 per watt installed. Roof pitch, shading, electrical panel upgrades and equipment choice move the price most, which is why quotes for the same house can differ by thousands.
Worth reading before you buy
Estimates only, generated 2026-08-22 from Google Solar API rooftop samples and average Idaho electricity rates. Not a quote and not financial advice. Your roof, usage, utility plan and local incentives will change these numbers — get real quotes before buying.