Solar panels in Bismarck, ND
Roofs in Bismarck get about 1,597 hours of usable sunlight a year — more than 64% of the cities we've measured. Here's what that means in cost, savings and payback, using real rooftop data rather than a national average.
Check your specific roof in Bismarck → City averages are a starting point; your own roof's size, pitch and shading change the answer a lot.
What a typical Bismarck solar system costs
A 20-panel system (8 kW) is about right for an average Bismarck home using 10,800 kWh a year. It would produce roughly 10,860 kWh annually and offset 100% of that usage.
| System | Size | kWh/yr | Net cost | Saves/yr | Payback |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 panels | 3.2 kW | 4,344 | $6,384 | $482 | 13.2 yrs |
| 12 panels | 4.8 kW | 6,516 | $9,576 | $723 | 13.2 yrs |
| 16 panels | 6.4 kW | 8,688 | $12,768 | $964 | 13.2 yrs |
| 20 panels | 8 kW | 10,860 | $15,960 | $1,200 | 13.3 yrs |
| 26 panels | 10.4 kW | 14,117 | $20,748 | $1,291 | 16.1 yrs |
How we worked this out for Bismarck
Every number on this page comes from these seven steps. Nothing is a national average — the sunlight figure is measured from Bismarck rooftops.
| # | Step | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | What one panel makes here 400W ÷ 1000 × 1,597 sun hrs × 0.85 system losses |
543 kWh/yr |
| 2 | Panels needed to cover typical usage 10,800 kWh ÷ 543 kWh per panel |
20 panels |
| 3 | System size 20 panels × 400W |
8.00 kW |
| 4 | Annual production 8.00 kW × 1,597 hrs × 0.85 |
10,860 kWh/yr |
| 5 | Installed cost 8,000 W × $2.85 per watt, then −30% federal credit |
$15,960 |
| 6 | Annual saving 3,780 kWh used as generated × 11.1¢ + 7,080 kWh exported × 11.1¢ |
$1,200/yr |
| 7 | Payback $15,960 ÷ $1,200 per year |
13.3 years |
Step 6 matters more than it looks. Only 35% of what a system this size produces in Bismarck is used the moment it is generated; the other 7,080 kWh is exported and credited one-for-one under net metering. Because exports here are credited at or near retail, that split changes the payback very little — 13.2 years against the 13.3 we show. In places where exports pay a fraction of retail the same split moves payback by years, which is why we model it explicitly rather than assuming.
Assumptions: 400W panels, 15% system losses (inverter, wiring, heat, soiling), $2.85/W installed, 10,800 kWh typical annual household use, 11.1¢/kWh electricity. Change any of those and every figure above moves — which is exactly why a single national "solar costs X" number is misleading.
Notice that payback barely improves as systems get bigger, and eventually gets worse. That's because you can only save money on electricity you were going to buy anyway. Once a system covers your usage, extra panels mostly generate exports at a much lower rate.
Why Bismarck gets 1,597 sun hours
That figure comes from Google's analysis of real rooftops across Bismarck — it already accounts for shading from trees, chimneys and neighbouring buildings, which is why it's lower than the raw "hours of daylight" figures you'll see elsewhere. An unusually open, unshaded roof in Bismarck reaches about 1,642 hours, roughly 3% better than typical.
The numbers behind this page
| Typical usable sunlight | 1,597 hrs/yr |
|---|---|
| Unshaded roof | 1,642 hrs/yr |
| Electricity rate (North Dakota avg) | 11.1¢/kWh |
| Installed cost assumed | $2.85/W |
| Panel size assumed | 400 W |
| Federal tax credit | 30% |
| Typical household usage | 10,800 kWh/yr |
| Power used as generated | 35% |
| Paid for exported power | full retail (net metering) |
| Rooftops sampled here | 12 |
| Google imagery from | 2012 |
When Bismarck actually produces
Annual totals hide the thing that catches people out: 39% of Bismarck's yearly sunlight arrives in May–July, and just 11% across November–January.
| Month | Sun hrs | Share of year |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | 57 | |
| Feb | 86 | |
| Mar | 125 | |
| Apr | 169 | |
| May | 202 | |
| Jun | 216 | |
| Jul | 209 | |
| Aug | 182 | |
| Sep | 141 | |
| Oct | 97 | |
| Nov | 64 | |
| Dec | 50 |
That is a severe seasonal swing — Bismarck produces roughly 4.4× as much in Jun as in Dec. A system sized to cover your annual usage will overproduce badly in summer and fall well short in winter, so how your utility credits exported power matters more here than in most places.
The annual total is measured from Google's rooftop imagery. Its split across months is calculated from solar geometry at Bismarck's latitude, not separately measured, so treat the monthly figures as the shape of a typical year rather than a forecast.
How Bismarck compares to the other 788 cities
| Measure | Bismarck | Rank of 788 |
|---|---|---|
| Usable sunlight | 1,597 hrs | 282nd |
| Sunlight lost to shade | 3% | 656th most |
| Median roof size | 379 m² | 37th largest |
| Electricity rate | 11.1¢ | 773rd highest |
| Payback | 13.3 yrs | 656th fastest |
| Grid carbon | 832 kg/MWh | 90th dirtiest |
What actually stands out about Bismarck:
- Plenty of roof to work with. Typical roofs here fit around 110 panels — roughly 5× what an average home needs. Roof size will not be what limits your system in Bismarck.
- Large roofs. At a median of 379 m², Bismarck has the 37th-largest typical roof footprint we've measured.
- Every kWh counts more here. The grid serving Bismarck emits 832 kg CO₂ per MWh, among the highest of the 788 cities measured — so the same panels displace more emissions than they would elsewhere.
- Sunnier than the rest of North Dakota. Bismarck roofs get 6% more usable sunlight than the typical North Dakota city we've measured — statewide averages will understate what you can expect here.
- Cheap electricity is the headwind. North Dakota power costs about 11.1¢/kWh. Low rates are good news generally, but they lengthen solar payback — there is simply less bill to displace.
- Older imagery. Google's aerial capture of Bismarck dates from 2012. Tree growth and new construction since then are not reflected.
Cities with almost the same sunlight
These are the closest matches to Bismarck's 1,597 usable sun hours from other states and provinces. Same sunlight, different electricity prices — which is usually what decides whether solar is worth it.
| City | Sun hrs | Rate | Payback |
|---|---|---|---|
| Summerville, SC | 1,596 | 14.2¢ | 10.4 yrs |
| Wilmington, NC | 1,599 | 13.2¢ | 11.2 yrs |
| Texarkana, AR | 1,595 | 12.4¢ | 11.9 yrs |
| Butte, MT | 1,595 | 12.1¢ | 12.2 yrs |
Nearby cities
See all of North Dakota → statewide sunlight, rates, incentives and every city we've measured.
Bismarck solar questions
How many solar panels do I need in Bismarck?
About 20 panels for an average home using 10,800 kWh a year. Bismarck roofs get 1,597 usable sun hours, so each 400W panel produces roughly 543 kWh annually. A typical Bismarck roof fits about 110 panels, so roof space is unlikely to be your limit.
Is solar worth it in Bismarck?
At 11.1¢/kWh and 1,597 sun hours, a typical system pays for itself in about 13.3 years and returns roughly $14,051 over a 25-year panel life. That is slower than average, so compare several quotes before committing. Exported power earns full retail credit here.
How much do solar panels cost in Bismarck?
A 8 kW system costs about $22,800 before incentives and $15,960 after the 30% federal tax credit. That works out near $2.85 per watt installed. Roof pitch, shading, electrical panel upgrades and equipment choice move the price most, which is why quotes for the same house can differ by thousands.
Worth reading before you buy
Estimates only, generated 2026-08-22 from Google Solar API rooftop samples and average North Dakota electricity rates. Not a quote and not financial advice. Your roof, usage, utility plan and local incentives will change these numbers — get real quotes before buying.